Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: glenn Date: Sep 22, 2006 11:38am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Soundboard ban

And higher sampling rates are better than lower, and better equipment and better adjustments etc. and endless cetera,

it's just a meaningless thing to say 'shn is not factory cd quality'

there is just no meaning whatsoever to the statement.

It sounds like someone from some cd factory trying to make it seem that their commercial cds are capable of producing better sound than shortened sound files can produce. Which is not in any sense or by any stretching of the English language a true statement.

Which is why I said don't even bother answering way back then when this was fresh.





Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Spaced Date: Sep 22, 2006 12:29pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Soundboard ban

But even Ann Coulter and Rush Limbaugh fans should understand that archiving a file to .zip doesn't lose information. Flac might be preferred because it is faster and makes smaller files.